> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.waterboy.tech/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# Version 3, I think.
- URL: https://www.waterboy.tech/version-3-i-think/
- Published: 2026-09-30T03:01:03.000Z
- Updated: 2026-09-30T03:01:03.000Z
- Author: waterboy
- Tags: QA Monk

We first started with an excel sheet for test cases(version 1)

Version 2 was the tracker + element IDs + Excel sheet output + Claude.

So this is version 3.

Problem: New features break old features. Old features are too complex to test off the top of my head. (complex meaning some toggles enable a whole branch of other features)

Solution: A process of generating a coverage map of all flows, manually testing them, and validating the tested flows using data.

![Solution map for my brain to visualise and remember lol. Every week I forget what problem I am actually solving and drift a little bit.](https://storage.ghost.io/c/19/ff/19ff0f2b-7d87-4f38-8a35-910b9e637720/content/images/2026/09/IMG_20260930_081829186-1.jpg)

Solution flow map for my brain to visualise and remember lol. Every week I forget what problem I am actually solving and drift a little bit.

I was tempted to add the tracker in this iteration, but I am sure something will come up in the other components. 

It's a bit harder to define scope when I don't know what the solution is going to be.

So here is my attempt at predicting the future.

The deadline is Saturday, so that is fixed. 

Sprint deliverables

**User Flow generation** 

\[ \] A markdown for buildprint to map all possible user flows into Excel csv template.

\[ \] Run on [Arkhitect](https://www.arkhitect.net/?ref=waterboy.tech) and verify if it covers all cases. 

**Excel csv** 

\[ \] See if there is a better way to display test cases and permutations. 

Everytime I open the testcases sheet, my brain shuts off.

How do I make it a bit more fun?

**Data Validation**

\[ \] Use buildprint to validate the test cases that ran and check whether they were actually correct.